Closure of China’s Houston consulate shows danger of desperate US behaviour
- Given the sharp decline in US-China diplomacy, the positive energy of the relationship’s early days has been replaced by petty bickering and recriminations
- The brazen disrespect of science and international law by the US is akin to insisting American exceptionalism be respected at the risk of public health
The desperate quality of US President Donald Trump’s failing administration is evident in the gross mishandling of the pandemic and the frittering away of diplomatic goodwill, so much so that influential Republican strategists have suggested the approach, “Don’t defend Trump, attack China”.
Given the sharp decline in US-China diplomacy, the positive energy of those heady, early days has been replaced by petty bickering. A tit-for-tat dynamic is evident as the world’s two biggest economies compete in trade and security affairs. Just as each side has responded in kind to journalist expulsions, and diplomatic invective is met with provocative language on both sides, expect a US consulate in China to be closed in response.
02:23
China calls US order to close Houston consulate ‘political provocation’
It’s neither good science nor good logic to confuse diplomatic immunity with immunity from Covid-19. It’s not fair or diplomatic to put countless others at risk just because you don’t want to be delayed upon flying in from a hot zone.
01:30
US warship captain seeks to isolate crew members as coronavirus spreads
Frustrated, he made a complaint outside Navy channels, for which he was dismissed and lost command of his ship. Even so, he was honoured by his crew and in the court of public opinion for putting a higher value on human life than the Navy’s face-saving protocol.
China has every reason to request that fresh arrivals from the US – which has seen nearly 150,000 deaths from Covid-19 – to submit to quarantine until infection can be ruled out. The US has a long history of setting and changing the rules but not playing by them, though. It uses consulates and embassies as spy centres yet protests, as alleged in the case of China’s Houston consulate, when other countries do the same.
If the US wants to restaff the China missions it abandoned in February, it is only reasonable it should support reasonable measures to contain the disease and respect science-based mitigation to that effect. It could furthermore be expected that its diplomats would enjoy some of the best facilities China has to offer. An American university administrator who was quarantined for two weeks in Shanghai after visiting Europe told me the hotel was clean and comfortable, the food good and the Wi-fi signal better than at home.
By most reports, the facilities used to temporarily quarantine foreigners in China are superior to those in the US, where the sloppy, ad hoc response has left many stranded and without assistance. What is the State Department asking for, other than to insist American exceptionalism be respected at the risk of endangering public health?
Science doesn’t work that way, and neither should diplomacy. Diplomatic immunity does not grant viral immunity. The sooner the “America-firsters” and anti-science bigots in the Trump administration recognise that, the better.
Philip J. Cunningham is the author of Tiananmen Moon, a first-hand account of the 1989 Beijing student protests