Advertisement
Advertisement
Move Forward Party leader and prime ministerial candidate, Pita Limjaroenrat, celebrates the party’s election results in Bangkok, Thailand, on May 15. Photo: Reuters
Opinion
Richard Heydarian
Richard Heydarian

Political shake-ups in Thailand and Turkey unlikely to spring foreign policy surprises

  • The opposition in power will be restrained by contentious domestic politics, a growing ‘multi-alignment’ consensus and the sheer value of strategic and economic ties with China

This year, two pivotal states in Asia faced their most consequential elections in recent memory. Although perched at opposite ends of the continent, Thailand and Turkey share much in common, prompting some political scientists to describe them as “unlikely twins”.

Turkey and Thailand are regional powers with dynamic export-oriented economies. They are also US treaty allies. Yet, Turkey and Thailand have maintained warm ties with China and other Eastern powers.

Crucially, the nations share a long history of military coups against democratically elected governments and have been under the thumb of strongman populist leaders in recent memory.

Against all odds, liberal opposition groups managed to perform exceptionally well in the recent elections, with the Move Forward Party winning the largest share of votes in Thailand, and a more unified Turkish opposition winning close to half of the votes in the presidential race. In both countries, liberal opposition forces are determined to roll back authoritarian policies and resuscitate the beleaguered democratic institutions.

But even if the opposition manages to capture power, with Thailand facing contentious coalition-building parliamentary politics and Turkey heading into a polarising run-off presidential election, it’s unlikely that either country will radically alter its foreign policy direction.

By all indications, both nations will optimise their prized position as “pivot states” in the 21st century – deftly balancing relations with the West and East to maximise national interests.

Kemal Kilicdaroglu, the presidential candidate of Turkey’s main opposition alliance, at the Republican People’s Party (CHP) headquarters on election night in Ankara, Turkey, on May 15. Photo: Reuters

Still, opposition leaders in both nations have indicated, as part of their anti-establishment campaigns, their commitment to alter foreign policy once in power.

Turkey’s main opposition leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu has advocated a more Western-friendly strategic orientation than the incumbent Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

For instance, Kilicdaroglu’s camp has promised to restart membership negotiations with the European Union and to move to comply with the European Court of Human Rights, including the release of several dissidents, to align Turkish institutions with liberal values. Crucially, he backs Nato’s expansion in promising to rescind Turkey’s opposition to Sweden’s membership.
In Thailand, opposition leaders will almost certainly want to revisit Thailand’s cosy relationship with Myanmar’s junta. Within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, an opposition-led Thailand may even be open to decisive measures, including a potential expulsion of the junta.

02:21

Indonesian president calls for ‘more unity’ to resolve Myanmar crisis

Indonesian president calls for ‘more unity’ to resolve Myanmar crisis
Moreover, opposition leaders have promised to reassert Thailand’s leadership in regional forums by adopting a more proactive diplomacy, especially in trade and investment. Accordingly, Thailand may actively pursue participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

Still, there are three main reasons to be sceptical about a radical reorientation of Thai and Turkish foreign policy soon. To begin with, opposition groups face extremely contentious domestic politics even if they dislodge their conservative rivals.

In Thailand, the progressive Move Forward Party, which has publicly opposed lèse-majesté and mandatory military conscription laws, is facing stiff resistance from conservative forces in its bid to form a new government.

Even with the most seats in the lower house of the Thai parliament, the youthful party is still not assured of forming the next government, given the lingering risk of a counter-coalition backed by the military-appointed Senate’s backing. And even if the party leader, Pita Limjaroenrat, becomes the next prime minister, he faces the threat of yet another military coup should he attempt to implement his most radical policies.

04:48

Pheu Thai joins coalition backing Move Forward Party’s Pita Limjaroenrat bid to become Thai PM

Pheu Thai joins coalition backing Move Forward Party’s Pita Limjaroenrat bid to become Thai PM

In Turkey, Kilicdaroglu, even if successful in the run-off elections, will face a still-powerful Erdogan, who will continue to wield tremendous influence through parliamentary allies and an army of appointees across key state institutions. The opposition leader will also have to contend with raucous allies who temporarily backed him only out of shared antipathy towards Erdogan.

Can Turkey’s divided opposition oust Erdogan from power after 20 years?

This brings us to the second major factor, namely the strength of an increasingly “multi-alignment” consensus in both countries.

In Thailand, famed for its “bamboo diplomacy” of playing superpowers against each other, Pita has argued that “the new world order is no world order”, hence the necessity of his country not aligning with any superpower so as to preserve maximal strategic autonomy. Thai opposition leaders often cite Singapore as an inspiration, given the city state’s aptitude for maintaining robust ties with both the United States and China.
Turkey’s Kilicdaroglu has also indicated his commitment to continuing to mediate in the Ukraine war and to maintain a balanced relationship with Russia. A self-described nationalist, Kilicdaroglu has signalled a significant continuity on major foreign policy issues, including Ankara’s robust relations with neighbouring Iran and its controversial support for Azerbaijan’s conflict with Armenia. If anything, Kilicdaroglu is advocating a Turkic Silk Road to consolidate his country’s position as a pivotal Eurasian power.

01:32

China-made trains start operating on Turkey’s first high-speed metro line

China-made trains start operating on Turkey’s first high-speed metro line
This brings us to the final factor, namely the sheer gravity of strategic and economic ties with China. Over the past decade, the Asian superpower has emerged as a major trade, investment and even defence partner to both Thailand and Turkey. In 2020, China dislodged Japan as the top investor in Thailand; it was also Turkey’s second largest trading partner as of 2021.
Both countries also back China’s trillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative in hopes of accelerating regional connectivity and infrastructure modernisation at home. The Turkish foreign ministry has a special division solely focused on cooperation related to the Belt and Road Initiative.

Crucially, China has conducted war games with both Thailand and Turkey, as the two Asian nations seek to diversify their defence relations beyond traditional Western allies. Although both nations are expected to experience major domestic political tremors, their overall foreign policy orientation is likely to remain predictable for now.

Richard Heydarian is a Manila-based academic and author of “Asia’s New Battlefield: US, China and the Struggle for Western Pacific”, and the forthcoming “Duterte’s Rise”

Post