Advertisement
Advertisement
Illustration: Craig Stephens
Opinion
Mohamed Zeeshan
Mohamed Zeeshan

For India to be an effective partner to the US, it needs stability at home

  • Massive troop deployments in Kashmir and more recently in the state of Manipur strain India’s already inadequately funded military
  • This could make New Delhi less willing to commit support to Washington against Beijing, which in turn could decrease US congressional support for a defence partnership
When India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrives in the US, he will be heartily welcomed by a country that is keen on New Delhi acting as an ally in Asia.
For at least two decades, the United States has invested heavily in India’s rise and helped boost its defence capabilities. This has continued despite India’s unwillingness to align with the West on Iran, Russia and Ukraine, among other geopolitical issues.

Washington hopes that a stable, democratic India will counterbalance China’s influence in Asia and work in tandem with US strategic interests. For that, the US believes that bolstering India’s military is essential.

Meanwhile, Modi has been trying to enhance India’s hard power. Capital spending on defence has been increasing since he came to power. In the 2023-24 budget announced in February, India allocated 13 per cent more funds to the defence sector than in the previous year.

Some of India’s expenditure on defence has already borne fruit. This month, the navy put on display a new indigenous aircraft carrier, which should become fully operational later this year, in an exercise involving over 35 aircraft. Modi now hopes to sign a deal with the US to co-produce jet engines for Indian fighter aircraft.

Yet, despite this incremental progress, India’s military forces remain heavily overburdened. Notwithstanding increased spending, India’s defence sector has suffered a massive shortfall between funds allocated and the military’s needs over the past five years. There have long been concerns that the country’s naval fleet is reaching obsolescence and that the strength of the air force’s fighter squadrons is declining.

The military’s needs, however, are only burgeoning with time. Despite negotiations with China following the deadly border clash in 2020, India now anticipates a permanently heavy deployment on the disputed border. With ongoing political instability in Pakistan, there are also worries about spillovers on the western front, where militants have previously exploited political chaos at home to carry out cross-border attacks in India.

Recent events have also shown that troubles at home have the potential to further deplete India’s already thinly stretched military resources.

Take the northeastern state of Manipur, for instance. After horrifying ethnic clashes broke out there early last month and local police forces proved inadequate, the military was called in to control the violence. Nearly 40,000 security personnel have been stationed in Manipur, according to one report, including an army division whose primary role is to serve as a reserve formation for the border with China. With no political solution in sight, there is a danger that the Indian army may end up with a substantial long-term deployment there.
Meanwhile, tens of thousands of army troops have been stationed in Kashmir – one of the world’s most heavily militarised regions – after New Delhi controversially stripped the state of Jammu and Kashmir of its semi-autonomous status in 2019.

While the Modi government is reportedly pondering the withdrawal of these troops from Kashmir’s hinterland to be replaced by the Central Reserve Police Force, many remain concerned over the resulting potential for instability. Over the past few years, Kashmir has witnessed multiple episodes of violence against police officers, government employees and the Hindu minority.

There have also been sporadic outbreaks of violence in other parts of India in recent years, as communal tensions remain high between Hindus and Muslims. In March, communal violence broke out in multiple states during religious processions. Such episodes will keep India’s security apparatus on edge and serve to increase pressure on its military because of the threat of further deployment.

An Indian paramilitary soldier stands guard as Kashmiri Hindus take part in a procession to mark Ram Navami festival in Srinagar, in Indian administered Kashmir, on March 30. Photo: AP

With Asia’s security landscape becoming potentially more volatile, these developments should worry both India and the US. Increased demand for security deployments to fight domestic problems could make New Delhi less willing to commit support to Washington against Beijing, including in the event of a potential conflict over Taiwan, the South China Sea or other flashpoints.

That likely scenario may also result in a diminished appetite in Washington for treating India as a key security partner in Asia. Although Modi is expected to be given a rapturous welcome in Washington this week, the US seems to have already recognised India’s limitations and is pivoting to other partners on security issues.

Over the past several months, it appears to be more focused on its defence ties with Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines. This month, Japan joined Nato’s largest-ever air force drill in Germany. There is also talk of Nato setting up a liaison office in Japan.

As Blinken visits China, the big economic picture should be on his mind

If the US deems India’s domestic situation too unstable, it may also be less willing to share advanced defence technology with New Delhi – one of Modi’s key priorities in the relationship.

In recent years, there has been criticism in Washington of India’s internal politics, while New Delhi’s steadfast pursuit of a non-aligned foreign policy on various geopolitical issues has also come under scrutiny. If Washington believes India’s military is too distracted by threats at home, that may temper political support in the US Congress for a defence partnership with India.

For Modi, this ought to spark concern. Unless India is able to maintain stability at home and eschew divisive communal rhetoric in politics, New Delhi might find itself weakened and marginalised in Asia’s evolving geopolitical landscape.

Mohamed Zeeshan is a foreign affairs columnist and the author of Flying Blind: India’s Quest for Global Leadership

Post