Asia has wary welcome for G7’s answer to China’s Belt and Road Initiative
- The Build Back Better World initiative (B3W) was promoted the recent G7 summit but remains light on details and isn’t expected to become a reality for some years
- A challenge for B3W will be matching the speed at which China has been able to engage developing economies in the region
Choi Shing Kwok, director of the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, said Southeast Asian nations are wary of overdependence on China, creating a potential opening for B3W when it eventually arrives.
At the same time, B3W’s multilateral nature would make it a more complex and potentially slower moving initiative than BRI.
“Southeast Asian countries that have hosted BRI projects, they often did so because of the ease with which such deals have been struck in the past,” Choi said. “It isn’t because of any ideological or geopolitical reasons.”
The B3W plan involves the G7 and its allies using the initiative to mobilise private-sector capital in areas such as climate, health and health security, digital technology, and gender equity and equality.
Indonesian Deputy Foreign Minister Mahendra Siregar told Reuters the country has several projects that would be open to co-investment and was ready to intensify engagement with developed nations.
However, the country’s coordinating ministry for maritime affairs and investment, Indonesia’s main point of contact for BRI projects, said developed nations would need to shake off their past reluctance to commit to local development.
“We welcome the (B3W) initiative, but of course we hope this time they put their money where their mouth is,” said Jodi Mahardi, a spokesperson for the ministry.
China vows ‘bigger contribution’ in helping poor countries
While China is among Indonesia’s biggest investors, the country has mostly opted for Chinese finance delivered on a business-to-business basis, rather than state-backed investment or through BRI initiatives.
The most high profile belt and road project in Southeast Asia’s largest economy is the Jakarta-Bandung high speed railway that is facing cost overruns.
More than 100 countries have signed agreements with China to cooperate in more than 2,600 BRI projects worth US$3.7 trillion, according to a Refinitiv database.
But despite international concerns about China’s growing influence, analysts and policymakers expect Asia’s long-term development needs to trump politics.
The Asian Development Bank in 2017 estimated developing economies in the region would need to spend US$1.7 trillion a year on infrastructure through to 2030 to sustain growth.
Australia axes Victoria state’s belt and road pact with China
The Philippines’ Economic Planning Secretary Karl Chua said his country remained open to engaging a range of partners that have good infrastructure experience, including Japan, China, South Korea, Europe and the United States.
“The fact is we have a big gap in infrastructure which we have started to fill up vigorously in the past five years and we will continue to do so,” Chua said.
A Bangladeshi foreign ministry official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters that Dhaka remained committed to its belt and road partnerships.
Roland Rajah, an economist at the Sydney-based Lowy Institute think tank, said while countries would in most cases be able to choose between Chinese or Western support without major political repercussions, certain sectors could be more problematic.
“For sensitive infrastructure such as telecoms and strategically located ports, however, it will continue to be either/or and they’ll be under pressure to make the ‘right’ choice.”