Advertisement
Advertisement
Conor McGregor celebrates his loss to Floyd Mayweather with a dram of his own branded whiskey in Las Vegas. Photo: Getty Images
Opinion
The Takedown
by Paul Ryding
The Takedown
by Paul Ryding

A McGregor-Pacquiao farce would be another swindle, but it might silence ‘Notorious’ once and for all

  • McGregor and Mayweather managed to dupe millions into paying to watch their farcical spectacle three years ago
  • History has a danger of repeating itself as McGregor talks up a similar crossover exhibition with eight-division world champion Pacquiao
What would the world gain from getting behind a Conor McGregor-Manny Pacquiao “super fight”? Well, there are certainly enough people in the world who would be happy to see the Irish popinjay take the pasting that would inevitably befall him. His behaviour in recent years has been such that he is now firmly cast as pantomime villain and people have always paid to see a bad guy get his comeuppance.

The eternally popular Pacquiao would cop a bumper payday that might allow him to bring a tidy end to his illustrious fighting career, thereby avoiding the twilight sullying of his legacy that has tarnished the records of many fine champions before him.

Perhaps the greatest gift this contest would yield is that it may once and for all stop the hubristic McGregor believing he has the necessary skills to challenge professional boxers in any meaningful way.

Few who witnessed the fiasco that was the first box office crossover “super fight” between McGregor and Floyd Mayweather Jnr in August 2017 would have been sated by the fare they were served that night.
“The Money Fight” was billed as “the biggest fight in combat sports history”. What transpired was a third-rate display of alarmingly unorthodox boxing from a loud-mouthed novice (who had claimed he could win the fight in one round, if he wanted to) who had no business being paired with arguably the greatest fighter of all time.
McGregor was game, but that was it. Mayweather schooled the former UFC champion from the opening bell, stringing him along and pawing at him like a mischievous house cat until he decided enough was enough and wore the Irishman down to a nub. The referee stepped in as a battered and swollen McGregor puffed his way around the ring leaden-footed walking onto shot after shot.

The whole charade left a sour aftertaste. Laughably now, millions across the globe were duped into paying US$100 to witness the farce thinking it would actually be a contest. They had been cheated. McGregor cracked open a bottle of his whiskey in the ring afterwards to celebrate his share of the loot from the great swindle. It was a middle-finger to everyone he and his partner in crime had screwed.

Since that inglorious night, media-craving Mayweather has revealed he had not trained at all for the reported US$500-million dollar extravaganza, a disclosure that was met with barely a shrug in boxing quarters.

All smiles: Conor McGregor and Floyd Mayweather Jnr speak after their boxing match at T-Mobile Arena on August 26, 2017 in Las Vegas. Photo: Getty Images
Nobody who follows the sport closely ever suspected that fight was anything more than a money-spinning exercise for the pair. In that regard it scored top marks, but as an actual demonstration of the sweet science? A boxing audience would have gained more from watching those two YouTubers windmilling at each other for nine minutes earlier this year. At least they both took it seriously.

In another sinister twist, there was recently an almost criminally fraudulent admission from Mayweather that he allowed the Irishman to see the latter rounds of their bout, prolonging the spectacle to leave the door open for a potential second bumper pay cheque. Again, this confirmed the suspicion of many in boxing, but it doesn’t make the claim any less reprehensible.

Three years ago, I questioned the wisdom of putting a novice like McGregor in the ring with an undefeated world champion and one of the finest defensive fighters ever to grace the sport. I acknowledged that Mayweather, given his advanced years and the fact that he had been out of the ring for almost two years, and considering he had never been known as an explosive power hitter at 145 pounds, was never likely to prove to be too much of a concussive risk for the beginner. I did suggest, however, that were McGregor to go in with any number of other fighters in that division, whose fight styles were geared more towards power and multi-angle assaults, the stakes ratchet up considerably for the Irishman’s well-being.

Unfortunately for McGregor, Pacquiao doesn’t know how to play like Mayweather did.

Filipino great Manny Pacquiao would have far too much class for Conor McGregor. Photo: Handout

The Filipino has based his career on a high-power, high-output, relentlessly forward-facing fighting style. McGregor would never have come up against anything remotely similar in his own accomplished fighting career.

In terms of a contest, I cannot begin to fathom the circumstances where the Irishman would hear a second set of bells in that fight. The Filipino would simply have far too much in every boxing department for the Irishman.

A quick knockout would be the overwhelming smart money, followed closely by McGregor being pummelled to a standstill before the contest is waved off, also probably very quickly. It would certainly require the handling of an overly cautious referee that night.

Pacquiao recently aligned himself with McGregor’s Paradigm Sports Management, adding fuel to the speculation that he is perhaps angling for a lucrative crossover bout with the MMA superstar.

Floyd Mayweather Jnr easily beat Conor McGregor in their August 2017 ‘super fight’. Photo: Getty Images

It’s difficult to imagine there would be much of an appetite for this spectacle among boxing nor indeed MMA fans, so obvious is the outcome. But it was the great number of casual sport fans treating the contest as a once-in-a-generation event that propelled the takings for the McGregor-Mayweather scam. Would there be as much of an appetite to see this among that demographic?

Given the global appeal of both protagonists it is difficult to say, but potential punters would do well to remember the old saying: fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Post