Advertisement
Advertisement
Japan
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Flowers lie in front of a picture of the late Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny, in Stuttgart. Photo: dpa

Japan won’t ‘provoke Russia’ by bringing up Navalny’s death, even as it continues backing Ukraine

  • Tokyo is being criticised for not standing up for human rights by calling out Putin or Moscow over opposition leader Alexei Navalny’s death in custody
  • Analysts say Japan wants to avoid a ‘potential backlash’ as it remains reliant on Russian oil and gas
Japan
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is being roundly criticised for his failure to condemn Russian President Vladimir Putin or Moscow in connection with the death in captivity of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, with some analysts arguing Tokyo is staying quiet to avoid conflict.

“Japan is thinking that it should not antagonise Russia as any retaliation could be very damaging,” said Hiromi Murakami, a professor of political science at the Tokyo campus of Temple University. “Kishida and his cabinet members are keeping their distance because they fear a potential backlash.”

Navalny died on February 16 at the age of 47 in a notorious penal colony in the Arctic Circle, with Russian officials claiming he collapsed while on a walk at the gulag.

Japan faces ‘nightmare scenario’ as Russia, China could upset US-led order

Suspicions that the Russian president was behind the death of yet another one of his critics have been rife, with accusations coming from some of the world’s top leaders. US President Joe Biden said: “There is no doubt that the death of Navalny was a consequence of something Putin and his thugs did.”
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said in a message on X: “Navalny stood up for democracy and freedom in Russia – and apparently paid for his courage with his life.”
In a joint communique issued at the Munich Security Conference the day after Navalny’s death, the foreign ministers of the G7 expressed their shared outrage and demanded that Russia halt the persecution of political dissent and limitations on civil rights.
In Tokyo, however, Kishida and Foreign Minister Yoko Kamikawa have remained tight-lipped about Navalny’s death, and there have been no moves within the Diet towards a resolution condemning Moscow or even a request for clarification over the circumstances of his death.

02:00

Tributes pour in after Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny dies in prison

Tributes pour in after Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny dies in prison

The Sankei newspaper said in an editorial published on Tuesday: “We cannot help but feel dismayed by the callousness our political leaders have shown regarding the matter. This is not a fitting image for Japanese politicians aspiring to be recognised as esteemed members of the international community.

“They must do more if they say they respect liberty and democracy.”

The conservative newspaper was similarly incensed over comments by Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, who responded to a question at a press conference by saying he would “refrain from commenting since we do not have any definitive information”.

Pressed for a reaction to Navalny’s death, he added: “The matter is of grave interest to us and we will continue to closely monitor the situation.”

Tokyo is the third-largest donor of non-lethal military equipment and other aid to Ukraine this year, and Kishida does not want to provoke Russian criticism for that assistance
Yakov Zinberg, Kokushikan University

Yakov Zinberg, a Russia-born professor of international relations at Tokyo’s Kokushikan University, said Russian “propaganda television channels” had not mentioned Japan in their news programmes since the beginning of the year, which suits both Moscow and Tokyo.

“Russia’s strategy is to not be too critical of Japan because they are still buying Russian oil and gas, while Japan still wants – and needs – those resources,” he told This Week in Asia.

“Tokyo is also the third-largest donor of non-lethal military equipment and other aid to Ukraine this year, and Kishida does not want to provoke Russian criticism for that assistance,” he added. “They want to keep sending assistance quietly.”

Murakami agreed that the Japanese government was being “pragmatic” in not criticising Putin or Moscow, as a conflict could not only jeopardise its access to energy supplies but also its strategic interests.

Russia’s Putin ‘giving Japan two fingers’ with pledged trip to disputed islands

Tokyo has for decades walked a diplomatic tightrope with Moscow as it sought to regain control over the Kuril Islands, a chain of islands off the most northerly tip of Hokkaido that was seized by Soviet forces in the closing days of World War II.

Successive governments on both sides have held talks on the issue and there have been proposals to return some of the islands to Japanese control or for the joint economic development of the region, but Putin’s attitude has hardened in recent years. Tokyo, however, still harbours ambitions of reclaiming control over the territory, which may be another contributing factor behind its reluctance to condemn the death of Navalny.

The Japanese public, meanwhile, has been largely supportive of Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, although the lack of large-scale demonstrations outside the Russian embassy in Tokyo underlines the lack of desire on the part of ordinary Japanese to become any more involved in the situation, Murakami suggested.

“For many people, they realise it is a dictatorship and that something like the sudden death of an opposition leader is always a distinct possibility,” she added. “But there is also the sense that we are not citizens of that country and there is nothing that we can do about it.”

A woman holds a picture of deceased Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny during a protest in London on February 25. Photo: Reuters

James Brown, a professor of international relations specialising in Russian affairs at the Tokyo campus of Temple University, disagreed with that position, writing in an opinion article published in the Nikkei newspaper on Monday that while Japan claimed to be a world leader on human rights, “in reality, Japan often regards international human rights issues with indifference”.

The article also argued that Tokyo had “turned a blind eye to abuses committed by Myanmar’s military”, noting that the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar had called on the Japanese government to halt a training programme for officers in the Southeast Asian country’s military junta.

It also called out Kishida for abolishing the position of special adviser to the prime minister on human rights, a position he had created less than two years before, and for opting to retain the cabinet position of minister for economic cooperation with Russia last year, despite the war in Ukraine having already raged for 18 months.

Tokyo’s contributions to Ukraine deserved praise, the Nikkei article stated, but added that it “should recognise that Putin’s regime must be opposed, not only because it violates the sovereignty of neighbouring states, but because it violates the basic human rights of its own citizens”.

“Navalny’s death provides Japan with an opportunity to demonstrate that its claims to uphold international human rights are not mere rhetoric.”

14